Legal Opinion

In Re Hall

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 2009No. 07-0322PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Medina

In this original mandamus proceeding, we must decide whether an indigent person, adjudicated a juvenile delinquent as a minor and sentenced to forty years, has a statutory right under the Juvenile Justice Code to the appointment of an attorney in a habeas corpus proceeding filed after that person becomes an adult. The juvenile offender in this case filed a pro se motion with the juvenile court several years after his transfer to an adult facility. In this motion, he requested a hearing and the appointment of counsel to pursue habeas corpus relief challenging the legality of his imprisonment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Texas Department of Transportation v. NeedhamTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. McIntyre v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Ex Parte GravesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. TGS-NOPEC GEOPHYSICAL CO. v. CombsTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Texas State Board of Examiners v. Texas Medical Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  3. the City of Houston, Texas v. Roger Bates, Michael L. Spratt and Douglas SpringerTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State of Texas v. $1,760.00 in United States Currency, 37 "8" Liner MacHinesTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Harris County Appraisal District v. Texas Workforce CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 2017

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API