In Re Hall
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Medina
In this original mandamus proceeding, we must decide whether an indigent person, adjudicated a juvenile delinquent as a minor and sentenced to forty years, has a statutory right under the Juvenile Justice Code to the appointment of an attorney in a habeas corpus proceeding filed after that person becomes an adult. The juvenile offender in this case filed a pro se motion with the juvenile court several years after his transfer to an adult facility. In this motion, he requested a hearing and the appointment of counsel to pursue habeas corpus relief challenging the legality of his imprisonment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Texas Department of Transportation v. NeedhamTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- McIntyre v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Ex Parte GravesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- TGS-NOPEC GEOPHYSICAL CO. v. CombsTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Texas State Board of Examiners v. Texas Medical Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- the City of Houston, Texas v. Roger Bates, Michael L. Spratt and Douglas SpringerTexas Supreme Court · 2013
- State of Texas v. $1,760.00 in United States Currency, 37 "8" Liner MacHinesTexas Supreme Court · 2013
- Harris County Appraisal District v. Texas Workforce CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 2017
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.