Legal Opinion
Henne v. Summers
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 6, 1914No. Civ. No. 1393PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
In this action i lie defendant is sued upon a bond signed by her as surety for Edward Booth and John W. Neighbours, to secure the performance of certain obligations of a lease made to said princij: .sis by the plaintiffs’ predecessor in interest. The same instruments were construed by this court as to some of their term;-; in Henne v. Summers, 16 Cal. App. 67, [116 Pac. 86], but the testimony considered in that decision is not before the court on the record in this case. The bond was conditioned upon terms that were “to secure the full performance of all the obligations contained in said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brosnan v. KramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Donnelly v. HufschmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Henne v. SummersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- College National Bank v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Jordan v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Cohn v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Murphy v. Luthy Battery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925