Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Carlisle Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1996No. 3560PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This is an appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County denying appellants’ motion for a new trial and entering judgment in favor of appellees on September 7, 1994. The above-captioned consolidated cases involved claims for alleged personal injury resulting from exposure to asbestos. At the completion of the damages portion of this reverse bifurcated trial, the jury returned a verdict for the defense stating that appellants James Alexander, Cleopheus Benton and James Lord did not sustain an asbestos related injury. The jury further found that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. ClaypoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Marinari v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. McCauley v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Com. v. Murray, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Mansour v. LingannaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Com. v. Murray, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API