Legal Opinion

Pratt v. Allen

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1982PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Charles B. Swartwood, J.

Donald G. Campbell and Diane M. Campbell, pursuant to section 300 et seq. of the New York State Highway Law, have applied for a private road to link property they own to a public highway. The Campbells’ proposed private road would pass across property of Merrill G. Pratt and Clara Pratt, which property contains no right of way or easement for the benefit of the Campbell property. The Pratts were notified of this application by Donald Allen, Superintendent of Highways for the Town of Tyrone, pursuant to *245section 303 of the New York State Highway Law.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Clark v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Matter of N.Y. City H. Authority v. MullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Strickley v. Highland Boy Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Yonkers Community Development Agency v. MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Witter v. TaggartNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Daly v. Aspen Center for Women's Health, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Cirelli v. EntDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  4. Bieker v. Suttons Bay Township SupervisorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Bieker v. Suttons Bay Township SupervisorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API