Legal Opinion

American Medical Technologies, Inc. v. Miller

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided September 28, 2004No. 14-03-01097-CVPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJORITY OPINION

WANDA McKEE FOWLER, Justice.

I.INTRODUCTION

John A. Miller sued American Medical Technologies, Inc. (“AMT”) for benefits allegedly due under an employment agreement. AMT moved to compel arbitration based on the agreement while also claiming there was no valid employment agreement. The trial court denied AMT’s motion. AMT filed an interlocutory appeal and a petition for mandamus, alleging in both that the trial court erred in denying AMT’s motion to compel arbitration.

We are asked to resolve two questions. First, what is the proper procedural posture for this arbitration dispute…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. In Re D. Wilson Const. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In Re Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. TMI, INC. v. Brooks, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  4. Goss v. Houston Community Newspapers, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  5. In Re Weeks Marine, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API