Legal Opinion
Bowman v. McPheeters
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 27, 1947No. Civ. 7270PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment entered on an order sustaining, without leave to amend, the demurrer to his fifth amended complaint which seeks a recovery for damages for malpractice.
By its order sustaining the demurrer, the trial court concluded that the cause or causes of action were barred by section 340, subdivision 3, of the Code of Civil Procedure, providing a one-year period of limitation for the commencement of an action for injury by the wrongful act or neglect of another. Likewise, the only ground of attack on the sufficiency of the complaint urged on appeal by the appearing…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Witherell v. WeimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Sanchez v. South Hoover HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Samuel CONERLY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Stafford v. ShultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.