Samuel CONERLY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
Conerly appeals from the dismissal of his civil rights action for employment discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 against Westinghouse. The district court dismissed Con-erly’s action because it had not been filed until twenty-seven years after the alleged act of discrimination had occurred, and was therefore barred by the statute of limitations.
When Conerly was hired by Westinghouse on January 4, 1949, he was the only black employee in his division. He was subsequently laid off on January 10, 1950. On July 3, 1950, Conerly returned to work at Westinghouse.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Regina (Rega) Jablon v. Dean Witter & Co., and Sydney TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Sun'n Sand, Inc. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Briley v. State Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Smith-Haynie, J. C. v. Davis, AddisonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Parviz Karim-Panahi v. Los Angeles Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Wasco Products, Inc. v. Southwall Technologies, Inc. Bostik, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.