Baulec v. . New York Harlem R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] But a single question is presented by the record before us in this action. It is conceded, or if not conceded it must be regarded as too firmly established as well upon principle as by authority to be now questioned, that if a master is wanting in proper care in the selection of servants, and negligently or knowingly employs or retains in his service those who are incompetent and unfit for the duties to which they are assigned, he is liable to respond to other…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Laning v. . N.Y.C.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
3Cited by90 opinions
- Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Laidlaw v. . SageNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Dwight v. . Germania Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Ohio & Mississippi R. W. Co. v. CollarnIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- McCrink v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.