Legal Opinion
Ingalls Iron Works Company v. Ingalls
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided August 18, 1959No. Civ. A. 7651, 8450PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GROOMS, District Judge.
The Court, having heretofore entered its Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Interlocutory Judgment, and having this day rendered its final decree herein, deems it appropriate to state its views of the applicable legal principles involved.
Propriety of Procedure Employed
The Ingalls Iron Works Company, “respondent” to the consolidated petitions of Ellen Gregg Ingalls and James A. Simpson as Executors (defendants and counterclaimants in Civil Action No. 7651) and of Ellen Gregg Ingalls in her individual capacity (defendant and counterclaimant in Civil Action No.…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Bank of United States v. DandridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Holker v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Waters v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, PaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Hennessy v. BaconSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Olcott v. . Tioga Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Teodore Dorotee Autera v. Manuel Dudley Robinson, Anthony C. Autera v. Manuel Dudley RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Puritan Medical Center, Inc. v. CashmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Cummins Diesel Michigan, Inc. v. The FalconCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
- Main Line Theatres, Inc. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Perkins v. RichMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.