State v. Koeppen

¶1. Thomas W. Koeppen appeals from a judgment of conviction for failure to comply with an officer while being taken into custody as a habitual offender contrary to WlS. STAT. §§ 946.415 and 939.62(l)(b) (1997-98). Koeppen also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion requesting a sentence modification because of a new factor. He raises four arguments on appeal. First, he argues that he was denied his right to a unanimous jury verdict because the court instructed the jury by using disjunctive language to describe the crime and did not require it to agree on which act he…