Rolland v. Cellucci
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Docket No. S3) and DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED COMPLAINT (Docket No. 55)
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
This class action suit involves seven representative plaintiffs and two organizational plaintiffs, ARC Massachusetts (“ARC”) and Stavros Center for Independent Living (“Stavros”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”). In their complaint, as amended, Plaintiffs claim a violation of the integration mandate of the Americans with Disabilities Act (Count I), disability discrimination in violation of the Americans with…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Davis v. ShahCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Grant Ex Rel. Family Eldercare v. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Joseph S. v. HoganDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- M.A.C. v. BetitDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2003
- Rolland v. RomneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.