Legal Opinion
Hector Navarro v. Encino Motorcars
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 24, 2015No. 13-55323PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
We consider here a question of first impression for our circuit: Are “service advisors” who work at a car dealership exempt from the overtime pay requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) of 1938, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219, under 29 U.S.C. § 213(b)(10)(A), which exempts “any salesman, partsman, or mechanic primarily engaged in selling or servicing automobiles”? Reviewing de novo, Fortyune v. City of Lomita, 766 F.3d 1098, 1101 (9th Cir.2014), petition for cert. filed, 83 U.S.L.W. 3651 (U.S. Jan. 26, 2015) (No. 14-920), we answer that question “no” and,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Christopher v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Encino Motorcars, LLC v. NavarroSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Encino Motorcars, LLC v. NavarroSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Olive v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Alla Rosenfield v. Globaltranz EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Somers v. Digital Realty Trust, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.