Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy
This case addresses whether a federal statute requires payment of increased compensation to certain automobile dealership employees for overtime work. The federal statute in question is the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., enacted in 1938 to "protect all covered workers from substandard wages and oppressive working hours." Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc., 450 U.S. 728 , 739, 101 S.Ct. 1437 , 67 L.Ed.2d 641 (1981). Among its other provisions, the FLSA requires employers to pay overtime compensation to covered employees who work more than 40 hours in a…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by490 opinions
- Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of Univ. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Encino Motorcars, LLC v. NavarroSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Loper Bright Enterprises v. RaimondoSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
- State of California v. the Little Sisters of the PoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Laura Canaday v. The Anthem Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
485 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.