Legal Opinion

Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 2, 2018No. 16–1362PublishedCited by 406 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1138 Justice THOMAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 52 Stat. 1060 , as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., requires employers to pay overtime compensation to covered employees. The FLSA exempts from the overtime-pay requirement "any salesman, partsman, or mechanic primarily engaged in selling or servicing automobiles" at a covered dealership. § 213(b)(10)(A). We granted certiorari to decide whether this exemption applies to service advisors-employees at car dealerships who consult with customers about their servicing needs and sell them servicing solutions.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by406 opinions

  1. Mei Xing Yu v. Hasaki Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  2. Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader MediaSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Wai Tom v. Hospitality Ventures LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  4. Susie Bigger v. Facebook, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  5. Bunn v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018

401 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API