Legal Opinion
Maverick Entertainment Group, Inc. v. Does 1 - 1,000
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 12, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2010-0569PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are motions to dismiss, quash, and for protective orders filed by sixty-six putative defendants. 1 These individuals have yet to be named as defendants in this case, but claim to have received notices from their Internet Service Providers (hereinafter “ISPs”) that plaintiff Maverick Entertainment Group, Inc. seeks their identifying information in connection with allegations in the Complaint that certain IP addresses used a file-sharing program called BitTorrent to download and distribute illegally the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sony Music Entertainment Inc. v. Does 1-40District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Arista Records LLC v. John Does 1-19District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Next Phase Distribution, Inc. v. John Does 1-27District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Spaeth v. Michigan State University College of LawDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Dillon v. BMO Harris Bank, N.A.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2014
- Malibu Media, LLC v. Does 1-11District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Maverick Entertainment Group, Inc. v. Does 1 - 1,000District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.