Legal Opinion
Maverick Entertainment Group, Inc. v. Does 1 - 1,000
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 19, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2010-0569PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
On June 9, 2011, putative defendant Frank Digiovannangelo moved to intervene in this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24 in order to quash the subpoena issued by the plaintiff to his Internet Service Provider (hereinafter “ISP”), or, in the alternative, to obtain dismissal from these proceedings. Referencing the Court’s Memorandum Opinion dated May 12, 2011, ECF No. 133, the Court denied the Movant’s motion by Minute Order on June 17, 2011. On July 8, 2011, the plaintiff moved for sanctions against Mr. Digiovannangelo’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. National Children's Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Karsner v. LothianCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Prudential Securities Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Defenders of Wildlife v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012