Legal Opinion

Thein v. Burrows

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 30, 1975No. 1335-2PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, C.J.

Plaintiff, Joseph Thein, brought this action for a permanent injunction and damages for the wrongful cutting of timber on his property. During trial without a jury, each party introduced two surveys attempting to establish a boundary line to be used as a timber cutting line between the two parcels in question. At the conclusion of the trial, the court found that only defendant’s survey had been properly conducted and the court accepted that survey to establish the cutting line. Plaintiff appeals from that finding and the resulting dismissal of his lawsuit.

The sole issue on appeal is whether…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ghione v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Harper v. HolstonWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Staaf v. BilderWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Harris v. Swart Mortgage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pacheco v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Newfound Management Corp. v. SewerDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1995
  3. Erickson v. WickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  4. DD & L, INC. v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  5. Mark Mcdonald, V. Michael Stern & Emma SternCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API