Legal Opinion

Harris v. Swart Mortgage Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1952No. 32041PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This is a contest between two claimants to a strip of land in section 18, township 9 north, range 29 E. W. M., situated in Franklin county. All of the strip lies in government lot 3 of section 18 except a small corner which is in government lot 2.

The land is vacant, unimproved and unfenced and has never been occupied. It lies lengthwise along the left bank of the Columbia river, which flows southeast; it is roughly rectangular in shape, approximately 1400 feet long by 200 feet wide. It is bounded on the northeast by a county road and on the southwest by the high water line of the river. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hirt v. EntusWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. State v. SturtevantWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Harper v. HolstonWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Washougal & LaCamas Transportation Co. v. Dalles, Portland & Astoria Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Sizor v. City of LogansportIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Erickson v. WickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  2. Thein v. BurrowsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  3. Thomas v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  4. Vavrek v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. Knutson v. ReichelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API