Legal Opinion

Leonardis v. Morton Chemical Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 12, 1982PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

184 N.J. Super. 10 (1982)

445 A.2d 45

ARCHIBALD LEONARDIS AND CHARLOTTE KROESCHEL, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

MORTON CHEMICAL COMPANY, DIVISION OF MORTON NORWICH PRODUCTS, A CORPORATION, AND ASTORLYN CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 22, 1982.

Decided March 12, 1982.

Before Judges ALLCORN, FRANCIS and MORTON I. GREENBERG.

Harold Sherman, argued the cause for appellants (Mandel, Wysoker, Sherman, Glassner & Weingartner, attorneys; George W. Conk, on the brief).

John B. LaVecchia, argued the cause for the respondent Morton Chemical…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kozlowski v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Bulloch v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1980
  3. Parkinson v. J. & S. TOOL CO.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  4. Cassano v. DurhamNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Elden v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Stager v. SchneiderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Ayhan Hakimoglu v. Trump Taj Mahal Associates Trump Taj Mahal, Inc. Donald Trump the Trump Taj Mahal Corporation Tm/gp Corporation. Ayhan Hakimoglu v. Boardwalk Regency CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. Feliciano v. Rosemar Silver Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  5. Harris v. ShermanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API