Legal Opinion

Parkinson v. J. & S. TOOL CO.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 2, 1974PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

*160Pashmaf, J.

This is an appeal by Ruth Parkinson from a judgment of the Appellate Division which affirmed a denial of dependency benefits by the Judge of Compensation. Appellant, though not legally married, was living as husband and wife with decedent Richard Parkinson, who, it is conceded, died from an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. N. J. 8. A. 34:15-7. We granted certification. 63 N. J. 328 (1973).

The sole issue is whether claimant is a “dependent” within the terms of N. J. 8. A. 34:15-13 (f) according to guidelines we…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brennfleck v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Gibson v. HughesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  3. Schotte v. SchotteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Holland America Insurance Company v. RogersDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bulloch v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1980
  2. Kazin v. KazinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. Lucy Freck, A/K/A Lucy Cameron v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. Leonardis v. Morton Chemical Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  5. Rutgers Council of AAUP Chapters v. RutgersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API