Legal Opinion
Cassano v. Durham
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 29, 1981PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
180 N.J. Super. 620 (1981)
436 A.2d 118
MARGARET CASSANO, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM AND GENERAL ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF RONALD CASSANO AND JANE STRUBLE, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
LAWRENCE R. DURHAM, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Passaic County.
Decided May 29, 1981.
Frederic J. Rossi for plaintiffs (Wegner & Wegner, attorneys).
George O. Foster for defendant (Fiorello, Moraff & Foster, attorneys).
SCHWARTZ, J.S.C.
The issue in this case is whether one who maintains a "live-in" relationship with another without the benefit of a marital ceremony may recover under the Wrongful…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kozlowski v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Schmoll v. CreecySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Turon v. J. & L. CONSTRUCTION CO.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Bulloch v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1980
- In Re the Probate of the Alleged Will of HolibaughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Leonardis v. Morton Chemical Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- In Re Estate of RozetNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Dunphy v. GregorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Dunphy v. GregorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- IN THE MATTER OF THE INTESTATE ESTATE OF RICHARD C. FEINSTEIN (P-261461, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.