Legal Opinion

Feliciano v. Rosemar Silver Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 12, 1987PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

Marcial Feliciano and the plaintiff Dolores Feliciano commenced an action in the Superior Court against Miguel Costa and Rosemar Silver Company (Rosemar) claiming that Marcial sustained personal injuries and the plaintiff sustained loss of consortium due to Costa’s wrongful conduct in the course of his employment by Rosemar. Rosemar moved for summary judgment on the loss of consortium claim. That motion was allowed, and the plaintiff appealed. We took the case on our own initiative. We now affirm the judgment.

According to the plaintiff’s deposition and affidavit submitted in connection with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Diaz v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. French v. McAnarneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Butcher v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Bulloch v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1980
  5. Sutherland v. Auch Inter-Borough Transit CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Goodridge v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  2. Elden v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Bobick v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  4. Attorney General v. DesiletsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  5. Armstrong v. LamyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API