Rodriguez v. Smith
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
CANNELLA, District Judge-
Petition for a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241 and 2254, is hereby denied. 1
This is the most recent in a line of cases challenging New York’s scheme of affirmative defenses on the basis of Mullaney v. Wilbur,. 421 U.S. 684, 95 S.Ct. 1881, 44 L.Ed.2d 508 (1975). 2 The instant applica tion challenges the constitutionality of New York Penal Law § 40.10(3), which makes renunciation of an “attempt” crime an affirmative defense. 3 Under New York law it is the defendant who has the burden of establishing an affirmative defense by a preponderance of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. JohnstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989