Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Smith

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 3, 1977No. 76 Civ. 2602 (JMC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANNELLA, District Judge-

Petition for a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241 and 2254, is hereby denied. 1

This is the most recent in a line of cases challenging New York’s scheme of affirmative defenses on the basis of Mullaney v. Wilbur,. 421 U.S. 684, 95 S.Ct. 1881, 44 L.Ed.2d 508 (1975). 2 The instant applica tion challenges the constitutionality of New York Penal Law § 40.10(3), which makes renunciation of an “attempt” crime an affirmative defense. 3 Under New York law it is the defendant who has the burden of establishing an affirmative defense by a preponderance of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. JohnstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. People v. ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API