Legal Opinion

Cameron v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 7, 2012No. 10-696CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*553OPINION

FIRESTONE, Judge.

This case involves a challenge by the plaintiff, Colonel Daniel Cameron (“Colonel Cameron”), a former member of the Active Guard Reserve (“AGR”),1 to a decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (“ABCMR”) denying Colonel Cameron’s claim for relief. Colonel Cameron claims that he was wrongfully discharged from active duty after 20 years of service without consideration by a retention board in violation of Army Regulation (“AR”) 135-18 ¶ 4-7.2 He seeks to be restored to active duty pending consideration by a retention board as well as accompanying back…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Richard P. Watson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  3. Williams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Cameron v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  5. Clark v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API