Legal Opinion

Gottschalk v. Becher

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to the district court for Platte county. Tried below before Post, J. Rexford v. Knight, 15 Barb. [N. Y.], 627; M. & O. R. Co. v. Malone, 46 Ala., 391; People v. Nevada, 6 Cal., 143; Gales-burg v. Hawkinson, 75 111., 152. Columbus v. Ins. Co., 25 Neb., 83; Wahoo v. Dickinson, 23 Id., 426.

1Opinion of the Court

Cobb, Ch. J.

In June, 1890, the plaintiff in error commenced her ac- • lion against the treasurer of said county, praying for a *654perpetual injunction against the collection of certain taxes, and setting up that she is the owner of certain real estate, beginning at a point 728 feet north of the southwest corner of the northeast quarter of section 19, township 17 north, range 1 east, of the sixth P. M., in said county, running thence east 568 feet, thence south 364 feet, thence east on a line parallel with the south line of the northeast quarter of said section 19, to a point directly north of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Wahoo v. DickinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  2. South Platte Land Co. v. Buffalo CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bisenius v. City of RandolphNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Carrithers v. City of ShelbyvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  3. Barnes v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  4. City of Russell v. Ironton-Russell Bridge Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. Hustead v. Village of PhillipsNebraska Supreme Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API