United States v. Cover
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Per curiam
Appellant has assigned eight errors for our consideration. We find no merit to errors I, II, III and VII. In light of our disposition of Assignments V and VI, we need not address error IV. Furthermore, because a rehearing may be ordered, it is premature to reach Assignment VIII, which *801asks us to test the sufficiency of the evidence to support appellant’s conviction of rape and communicating a threat.
While the obvious issue at trial was whether the sexual intercourse, which admittedly occurred, was the product of consent or force, the primordial question facing the triers of fact was who to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. GravesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. TangpuzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. DunksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. LucasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. ThomsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. JonesU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. EilandU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993