Legal Opinion

United States v. Eiland

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided October 13, 1993No. NMCM No. 9301250PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Senior Judge:

This general court-martial is before us on an appeal by the Government pursuant to Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 862, from an order entered by the military judge at trial abating the proceedings due to the unavailability of two witnesses requested by the accused/appellee. A military judge’s order abating a court-martial proceeding is the functional equivalent of a ruling that terminates the proceedings and is a proper subject for a Government appeal under Article 62. United States v. True, 28 M.J. 1, 2 (C.M.A.1989).

I

The appellee was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. BurrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  2. United States v. AllenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. SweeneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  4. United States v. TangpuzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  5. United States v. ThorntonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API