United States v. Eiland
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Senior Judge:
This general court-martial is before us on an appeal by the Government pursuant to Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 862, from an order entered by the military judge at trial abating the proceedings due to the unavailability of two witnesses requested by the accused/appellee. A military judge’s order abating a court-martial proceeding is the functional equivalent of a ruling that terminates the proceedings and is a proper subject for a Government appeal under Article 62. United States v. True, 28 M.J. 1, 2 (C.M.A.1989).
I
The appellee was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. BurrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. AllenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. SweeneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
- United States v. TangpuzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. ThorntonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2021