Legal Opinion
Keasler v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided June 30, 1983No. Civ. A. M-79-13-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL JUDGMENT
JOE J. FISHER, District Judge.
In 1974, the Defendant, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America (Natural) concluded a search for a natural gas storage reservoir with its decision to acquire the Rodessa-Young formation of the North Lansing field in Harrison County in east Texas. Natural purchased rights in the field and to the surface, sufficient, it claims, to give it use of the virtually depleted field as a storage reservoir.
The Plaintiffs in this class action, all having been paid by Natural for some interest, challenge the rights of Natural in the field.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Texas Company v. W.H. DaughertyTexas Supreme Court · 1915
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,777, 11 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 781 Chemetron Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Business Funds, Inc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Bunn v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bender v. BrooksTexas Supreme Court · 1910
- Humble Oil & Refining Company v. WestTexas Supreme Court · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Marburger v. Seminole Pipeline Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Eagle Properties, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1985
- The Estate of Nellie S. Johnston, Deceased, by Robert B. Payne, Independent v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- ANR Pipeline Co. v. 60 Acres of LandDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2006
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. AdamDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.