Legal Opinion

United States v. 13.20 Acres of Land

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided January 16, 1986No. C-85-031-JLQPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE: SCOPE OF PROJECT AND NAVIGATIONAL SERVITUDE DOCTRINE

QUACKENBUSH, District Judge.

BEFORE THE COURT is the United States’ Motion In Limine Concerning Valuation of Lands In Connection With Navigable Waters of the United States (Ct.Rec. 16), Motion to Establish Larger Parcels (Ct. Rec. 17), and a Supplemental Motion In Limine for Pretrial Rulings Concerning Scope of the Project Rule and Navigational Servitude Doctrine (Ct.Rec. 28), heard with oral argument on December 20, 1985. The United States was represented by Assistant United States Attorney Robert Sweeney;…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. 320.0 Acres of Land, More or Less in the County of Monroe, State of Florida,and Salvatore R. CicconeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. RandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API