Legal Opinion

Foreman v. Foreman

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1946No. 6958PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRATT, Justice.

On November 16, 1945, Mrs. Foreman instituted an action in the Third' District Court of Utah for a divorce from Otto C. Foreman. That same day she withdrew from the joint checking account of herself and Mr. Foreman, $1800' and took from their safety deposit box all the United States Government Bonds standing in the names of the parties. A temporary restraining order restraining her from disposing of the money or the bonds was served on her on November 21, 1945. An order to show cause why this restraining order should not be made permanent was heard on November 26, 1945. By…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pinion v. PinionUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Township of Noble v. AasenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Davidson v. MunseyUtah Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Miller v. MarksUtah Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Utah Commercial & Savings Bank v. FoxUtah Supreme Court · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wilson v. WilsonUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Ex Parte PrestonTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Bradshaw v. KershawUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Utah Farm Production Credit Ass'n v. LabrumUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Jackson v. JacksonUtah Supreme Court · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API