Legal Opinion

State v. Jefferson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1984No. 8312SC997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Defendant contends the court erred “in allowing [him] to represent himself where [he] did not make a knowing and voluntary waiver of his right to counsel because the court failed to advise [him] of his right to substitute appointed counsel if his original appointed counsel was dismissed due to irreconcilable conflict.” The record contains the following:

Waiver of Right to Assigned Counsel

As the undersigned party in this action, I freely and voluntarily declare that I have been clearly advised of my right to the assistance of counsel, that I have been fully informed of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. CroninSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. LashleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. BestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. AbleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BallewCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. BallewCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API