Legal Opinion

State v. Brooks

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1980No. 8029SC67PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

The indigent defendant moved “to represent himself as a jailhouse lawyer.” He was advised of his right to have counsel trained in the law to represent him but he filed a written waiver and insisted on proceeding pro se. He thereupon filed numerous, voluminous and repetitious pretrial motions, which account for about half of the 511-page record on appeal.

Defendant now assigns as error the trial court’s allowing him to represent himself and refusing to appoint standby counsel for him. This assignment of error is without merit. Defendant waived his right to appointed counsel and the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. TorainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. GeraldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. HernandezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  5. Hopkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API