Legal Opinion

State v. Able

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 29, 1971No. 7126SC727PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the denial of his timely made motion to abate the action and quash the indictment upon the ground that he was arrested on a capias when he had never been served with a warrant.

In State v. Hargett, 255 N.C. 412, 121 S.E. 2d 589 (1961), the defendant before pleading to the bill of indictment, moved that the proceedings be stayed and abated. He contended he was denied due process of law because he was arrested when no warrant had been issued and because a preliminary hearing was not held. In that case the court held at page 413:

“When a person is arrested…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HargettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State v. HackneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. State v. . CaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. State v. DoughtieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. FoustCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. JeffersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API