Legal Opinion

Hiatt v. Kinkaid

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1894No. 6471PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Error from the district court of Boone county. Tried below before Thompson, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Ryan, C.

Of a judgment in favor of the present defendant in error the. adverse party, upon error prosecuted to this court, *179obtained a reversal (Hiatt v. Kinkaid, 28 Neb., 721), and thereupon this cause was remanded for further proceedings. Subsequently an amended answer was filed, the court reserving the right to strike the same from the files—a right which later was exercised. Soon afterward, however, the court permitted the refiling of this amended answer upon condition that the costs up to that time should be paid by the defendant. To this answer a reply was filed and the cause was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Graham v. HartnettNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Tomer v. DensmoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Holmes v. HutchinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Gregory v. KaarNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  5. School District v. CaldwellNebraska Supreme Court · 1884

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Eggart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1898
  2. Maher v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  3. City of Chadron v. GloverNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. American Fire Insurance v. LandfareNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. McDonald v. BowmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API