Legal Opinion

Blodgett v. McMurtry

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1898No. 7851PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from tlie district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Strode, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

This action was to recover damages for wrongful interference with the title, not of record, to lot 4, in block 49, in the city of Lincoln, alleged to have been sustained by the execution of a quitclaim deed covering said lot and other property by the defendants to the Omaha & Republican Valley Railroad Company. Verdict and judgment were against the plaintiff', and he has brought the record here for review.

A brief reference to the facts is essential to an understanding of the questions presented. On February 3, 1876, the defendants, by a deed of general warranty, conveyed the lot in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. GulickNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Glaze v. ParcelNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Mullen v. MorrisNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Wanzer v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Imhoff v. RichardsNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Young v. KinneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State ex rel. Ragan v. JunkinNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API