Zacharin v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
*188 OPINION
MARGOLIS, Judge.
This patent infringement case is before the court after a one-day trial regarding the on-sale bar of 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). The government argues that plaintiffs patent is invalid under section 102(b) because the invention it covers was on sale more than one year before plaintiff filed his application for patent. Plaintiff argues that his patent is not invalid under section 102(b), but that even if it is, the doctrines of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, and equitable estoppel each prevent the government from raising the defense contained in section 102(b). After…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chemical Separation Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Phillips/May Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Chemical Separation Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Mistop, Inc. v. Aerofin Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2003