Legal Opinion

Mistop, Inc. v. Aerofin Corp.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 23, 2003No. 3:97-cv-01951PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RULING AND ORDER

CHATIGNY, District Judge.

Plaintiff Mistop, Incorporated, holds U.S. Patent No. 5,074,117, which relates to a process and system for handling air inside large office buildings. The invention addresses the problem of “water carryover” in air conditioning systems, which arises when droplets of condensation on cooling coils are picked-up and entrained in the air stream. The salient feature of the invention is a moisture reduction mechanism, or moisture eliminator, in the form of a “metallic mesh pad,” which is installed downstream from a cooling coil, where it catches the “carried…

2Cases cited29 opinions

MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007