Matter of Parental Rights as to Carron
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This court is asked to determine whether a district court can consider a father’s conduct during the mother’s pregnancy as evidence of his intent to abandon the child. Having reviewed the *372briefs and having had the benefit of oral argument of counsel, we affirm the district court’s order terminating appellant’s parental rights, and hold that a district court may consider a father’s pre-birth conduct as a factor establishing jurisdictional and disposi-tional grounds in termination of parental rights proceedings.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Appellant Shawn Whitney (“Shawn”) contests the termination…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- City Council of Reno v. Reno Newspapers, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re Adoption of Baby EAWSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Adoption of Michael H.California Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Baby Girl EasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Champagne v. WELFARE DIV. OF NEV. STATE DEPT.Nevada Supreme Court · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- Tammila G. v. State, Department of Human ResourcesNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Matter of Parental Rights as to NJNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Matter of Parental Rights as to QLRNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Sam Z. v. HikmetNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- C.V. v. J.M.J.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.