Legal Opinion

Matter of Parental Rights as to Carron

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1998No. 30377PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This court is asked to determine whether a district court can consider a father’s conduct during the mother’s pregnancy as evidence of his intent to abandon the child. Having reviewed the *372briefs and having had the benefit of oral argument of counsel, we affirm the district court’s order terminating appellant’s parental rights, and hold that a district court may consider a father’s pre-birth conduct as a factor establishing jurisdictional and disposi-tional grounds in termination of parental rights proceedings.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Appellant Shawn Whitney (“Shawn”) contests the termination…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City Council of Reno v. Reno Newspapers, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In Re Adoption of Baby EAWSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  3. Adoption of Michael H.California Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Re Baby Girl EasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  5. Champagne v. WELFARE DIV. OF NEV. STATE DEPT.Nevada Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tammila G. v. State, Department of Human ResourcesNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Matter of Parental Rights as to NJNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Matter of Parental Rights as to QLRNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Sam Z. v. HikmetNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  5. C.V. v. J.M.J.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API