Matter of Parental Rights as to QLR
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*603OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant Roger D. R. challenges a district court order terminating his parental rights to his minor child, Q.L.R. This appeal presents an issue of first impression for this court: Does incarceration, as a matter of law, support a determination that a parent intended to abandon his or her minor child? Roger contends that the district court erred by finding that, as a result of his incarceration, he abandoned Q.L.R. and that termination of his parental rights was in the child’s best interests. We agree and, therefore, reverse the district court’s order terminating Roger’s parental…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hennepin County Welfare Department v. StaatSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Crawford v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- In re R.H.N.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- In the Interest of K.A.W.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2004
- Diana L. N. v. State, Department of Human Resources, Division of Child & Family ServicesNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Richard J. K. v. State, Division of Child & Family ServicesNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- St. Mary v. DamonNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Francisco M. v. State, Division of Child & Family ServicesNevada Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.