Legal Opinion

Sam Z. v. Hikmet

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 2000No. 32436PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Agosti, J.:

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying a petition for termination of parental rights and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. In determining whether to terminate parental rights, this court has consistently applied the jurisdictional/dispositional standard set forth in Champagne v. Welfare Division, 100 Nev. 640, 691 P.2d 849 (1984). Based on legislative amendments to NRS 128.105, which sets forth the grounds for terminating parental rights, we now reject our Champagne standard, which requires a district court to find…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Egly v. Blackford County Department of Public WelfareIndiana Supreme Court · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of Parental Rights as to NJNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Williams v. GentryDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API