Legal Opinion

National Bank of Detroit v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1935No. Docket Nos. 108, 109, Calendar Nos. 38,434, 38,435PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

In compliance with the provisions of the'law (12 USCA, § 282; Treasury Document No. 2961, 1928, chap. 1, § 12), the National Bank of Detroit, plaintiff, upon its organization subscribed for an amount of stock in Federal reserve bank equal to six per cent, of its capital and surplus, and on March 21, 1933, paid $675,000, one-half of its subscription. It was required to do this before the comptroller of currency would issue a certificate authorizing it to begin business. The money paid for this Federal reserve bank stock came from the General Motors Corporation, which had paid in on that same…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cummings v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. In Re Appeal of Hoskins Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Eyke v. LangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Lenawee County Savings Bank v. City of AdrianMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. School District No. 6 v. School District No. 5Michigan Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Briggs Tax Service, LLC v. Detroit Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  2. S. S. Kresge Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Regency Park, LP v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  4. General Discount Corp. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  5. City of Ironwood v. Gogebic County Board of CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API