Legal Opinion

City of Salem v. Salisbury

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 31, 2000No. 96C12377; CA A103039PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

This case involves a declaratory judgment proceeding under ORS chapter 28 brought by the City of Salem (city) seeking a determination of its statutory and contractual obligation to supply uninsured motorists benefits to its police officers. Defendants and intervenor, Salem Police Employees’ Union (union), appeal from the trial court’s grant of the city’s motion for summary judgment. ORCP 47. Defendants include Officers Steven Salisbury and Theodore Kistner, members of the union, and Officer George Finch, who is not a union member. We reverse.

The underlying facts are not disputed. Defendants,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hale v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. WebbOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Evanhoff v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Holcomb v. SunderlandOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. SpainhowerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Premier West Bank v. GSA WHOLESALE, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Simpson v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. WerdellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Fleenor v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API