Legal Opinion

Fleenor v. Williamson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 27, 2000No. 9505-90754; CA A108731PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Appellant Daryl Fleenor (Daryl) 1 appeals from a probate court order denying his petition to set aside an unqualified disclaimer executed pursuant to Oregon’s Uniform Disclaimer of Transfers by Will, Intestacy or Appointment Act (Uniform Disclaimer Act), ORS 112.650 etseq. Daryl assigns error to the probate court’s conclusion that it had “no authority” either to set aside or reform the disclaimer based on Daryl’s unilateral mistake of law regarding the disclaimer’s effect. We affirm.

The facts are undisputed. Daryl and Gary Fleenor are brothers. In 1978, their mother, Rachel, executed a will…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Rainey v. QuigleyOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Manning Lumber Co. v. VogetOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Blake v. BlakeOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Webb v. WebbWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Colby v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Generaux v. DobynsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. In Re Estate of CiaffoniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Carvalho v. Estate of CarvalhoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  5. Carvahlo v. Estate of CarvahloSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API