Vandehey v. Wheeler
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.
In this declaratory judgment proceeding, which is equitable in nature, plaintiffs are three Washington County farmers who hold water permits entitling them to appropriate a set amount of water for irrigation. Defendants are the State Engineer and District Watermaster who issue such permits and regulate their use. Defendants have demanded that plaintiffs repair or reconstruct a dam in order to continue to appropriate water under their permits. Plaintiffs, arguing they have no obligation to do so, appeal from an adverse judgment in the circuit court.
In order to discuss the merits of this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- LEVENE ET UX. v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Washburn v. Inter-Mountain Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910
- Appleton v. Oregon Iron & Steel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Fitzstephens v. WATSONOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- In re North Powder RiverOregon Supreme Court · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Russell-Smith v. Water Resources DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Vandehey v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Vanderzanden v. SexsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976