Legal Opinion

Vanderzanden v. Sexson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 1, 1976No. 34-330, CA 5342PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.

This is a mandamus proceeding brought by certain landowners against the State Engineer1 to compel him to hold a hearing upon petitioners’ application for change in point of diversion of water based upon water right certificates issued to petitioners or their predecessors in interest allowing each specified quantities of water from West Dairy Creek. ORS 540.520. Respondent made return, issue was joined and the court heard extensive testimony. Thereafter it made extensive Findings of Fact.2 It concluded, however, *142that it was bound by our decision in Vandehey v. Wheeler, 13 Or App 25 at 37, 507…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Marr v. PutnamOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Stager v. Troy Laundry Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Koch v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Compensation of Hamlin v. Roseburg Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API