Reiser v. State
New York Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtLounsberry, P. J.
This is a motion by the State to dismiss the above-entitled claim on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The claim, which was prepared and filed by the claimant without benefit of counsel, does not adequately set forth the facts upon which it is based, and it has been necessary to glean additional information from the affidavit and the brief submitted by the State in support of the motion. This is technically irregular, of course, but the claimant, who was represented by counsel upon the argument of the motion, has not in any way disputed the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hurley v. Bd. of Education of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Matter of Barmonde v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Martin v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Matter of Turel v. DelaneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Bailey v. KernNew York Supreme Court · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sinicropi v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Ganguly v. New York State Department of Mental Hygiene-Dunlap Manhattan Psychiatric CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Eisert v. Town of HempsteadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Museum v. American Ass'n of MuseumsNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- Karaffa v. SimonNew York Supreme Court · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.