Legal Opinion
Eisert v. Town of Hempstead
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 6, 1996No. 93 CV 2388 (ADS)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPATT, District Judge:
Presently before the Court are three motions. The plaintiffs, Angela Eisert (“Ei-sert”) and Thomas Myles (“Myles” collectively the “plaintiffs”) have brought a motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). The defendants, the Town of Hempstead (the “Town”) and the Town of Hempstead Civil Service Commission (the “Commission,” together the “Town defendants”) have brought a motion for summary judgment by order to show cause to dismiss the remaining state law claims. The defendants Nassau County Republican Committee (the “Committee”) and the Town of…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. HalloranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- United States v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Krause v. Buffalo & Erie County Workforce Development Consortium, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2006
- Krause v. Buffalo & Erie County Workforce Development Consortium, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- D'ANGELO v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.