Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. Hentig

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1885PublishedCited by 57 opinions

Error from Shawnee District Court. ActioN brought March 11, 1884, by F. Q. Hentig and others against Geo. T. Gilmore, as county clerk, and Bradford Miller, as county treasurer of Shawnee county, and the City of Topelca, to perpetually enjoin the defendants from collecting certain taxes levied by the city of Topeka upon the lots of the plaintiffs in said city.

Read the full summary

Error from Shawnee District Court. ActioN brought March 11, 1884, by F. Q. Hentig and others against Geo. T. Gilmore, as county clerk, and Bradford Miller, as county treasurer of Shawnee county, and the City of Topelca, to perpetually enjoin the defendants from collecting certain taxes levied by the city of Topeka upon the lots of the plaintiffs in said city. The action was tried by the court without a jury, at the April Term, 1884, and the court 'made certain special findings of fact and conclusions of law as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT. 1. That the defendant, the city of Topeka, is a…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

~V ALEN TINE, J.:

This was an action, brought on March 11, 1884, in the district court of Shawnee county, by F. G. Hen-*164tig and others against George T. Gilmore, county clerk, Bradford Miller, county treasurer, and the city of Topeka, to perpetually enjoin the defendants from collecting certain sewer taxes levied by the city of Topeka upon the lots of the plaintiffs in said city. The action was tried by the court without a jury, and the court made certain special findings of fact and ■conclusions of law, and rendered judgment upon such findings and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Thomas v. GainMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Nichols v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1854
  5. Gilmore v. NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Dallas Country Levee District No. 2 v. LooneyTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  3. City of Fort Myers v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  4. City of Fort Myers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  5. Hennessy v. Douglas CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API