Legal Opinion
Warner v. Konover
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 21, 1989No. 13460PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiff tenant, Albert Warner, has stated a cause of action against his landlords, the defendants, Simon Konover, Marvin M. Patron, estate of A. Abner Rosen and estate of Martin Spector, for breach of contract arising out of the defendants’ refusal to consent to an assignment of a lease of commercial premises. The defendants successfully moved to strike the plaintiffs complaint, and judgment was thereafter rendered in the trial court on their behalf. The plaintiff filed an appeal, which we transferred to this court pursuant to Practice…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sheets v. Teddy's Frosted Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Michaud v. WawruckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Fernandez v. VazquezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Homa-Goff Interiors, Inc. v. CowdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Arrington v. Walter E. Heller International Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Dick Broadcasting Company, Inc. of Tennessee v. Oak Ridge FM, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- Peter-Michael, Inc. v. Sea Shell AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Home Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Garrity v. McCaskeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.