Legal Opinion
Shakhnes Ex Rel. Shakhnes v. Eggleston
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 30, 2010No. 06 Civ. 04778(RJH), 09 Civ. 4103(RJH)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD J. HOLWELL, District Judge:
This opinion disposes of five motions filed in two related actions. Plaintiffs in both Shakhnes v. Eggleston, No. 06 Civ. 04778 (“Shakhnes ”) and Menking v. Daines, No. 09 Civ. 04103 (“Menking”) allege procedural deficiencies in the processing of Medicaid appeals by the New York agencies responsible for Medicaid administration. In both, the plaintiffs assert that the agencies are legally obligated to resolve appeals from adverse determinations within ninety days after those appeals are made, and in both, the plaintiffs contend…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Shakhnes Ex Rel. Shakhnes v. BerlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- In re Vitamin C Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- MacNamara v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Fishman v. DainesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Samele v. ZuckerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.